CVE-2025-48071 — openexr
Fix: AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr@916cc72CVE-2025-48071 is a CWE-122 vulnerability in openexr. A fix is available for openexr — see the affected versions and patch details below.
OpenEXR's Forged Unpacked Size can Lead to Heap-Based Buffer Overflow in Deep Scanline Parsing
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-48071.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
openexrReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The OpenEXRCore code is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow during a write operation when decompressing ZIPS-packed deep scan-line EXR files with a maliciously forged chunk header.
Details
When parsing STORAGE_DEEP_SCANLINE chunks from an EXR file, the following code (from src/lib/OpenEXRCore/chunk.c) is used to extract the chunk information:
if (part->storage_mode == EXR_STORAGE_DEEP_SCANLINE)
// SNIP...
cinfo->sample_count_data_offset = dataoff;
cinfo->sample_count_table_size = (uint64_t) ddata[0];
cinfo->data_offset = dataoff + (uint64_t) ddata[0];
cinfo->packed_size = (uint64_t) ddata[1];
cinfo->unpacked_size = (uint64_t) ddata[2];
// SNIP...
By storing this information, the code that will later decompress and reconstruct the chunk bytes, will know how much space the uncompressed data will occupy.
This size is carried along in the chain of decoding/decompression until the undo_zip_impl function in src/lib/OpenEXRCore/internal_zip.c:
static exr_result_t
undo_zip_impl (
exr_decode_pipeline_t* decode,
const void* compressed_data,
uint64_t comp_buf_size,
void* uncompressed_data,
uint64_t uncompressed_size,
void* scratch_data,
uint64_t scratch_size)
{
size_t actual_out_bytes;
exr_result_t res;
if (scratch_size < uncompressed_size) return EXR_ERR_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
res = exr_uncompress_buffer (
decode->context,
compressed_data,
comp_buf_size,
scratch_data,
scratch_size,
&actual_out_bytes);
if (res == EXR_ERR_SUCCESS)
{
decode->bytes_decompressed = actual_out_bytes;
if (comp_buf_size > actual_out_bytes)
res = EXR_ERR_CORRUPT_CHUNK;
else
internal_zip_reconstruct_bytes (
uncompressed_data, scratch_data, actual_out_bytes);
}
return res;
}
The uncompressed_size comes from the unpacked_size extracted earlier, and the uncompressed_data is a buffer allocated by making space for the size "advertised" in the chunk information.
However, scratch_data and actual_out_bytes will contain, after decompression, the uncompressed data and its size, respectively.
The vulnerability lies in the fact that the undo_zip_impl function lacks code to check whether actual_out_bytes is greater than uncompressed_size.
The effect is that, by setting the unpacked_size in the chunk header smaller than the actual chunk decompressed data, it is possible - in the internal_zip_reconstruct_bytes function - to overflow past the boundaries of a heap chunk.
PoC
NOTE: you can download the heap_overflow.exr file from this link:
https://github.com/ShielderSec/poc/tree/main/CVE-2025-48071
- Compile the
exrcheckbinary in a macOS or GNU/Linux machine with ASAN. - Open the
heap_overflow.exrfile with the following command:
exrcheck heap_overflow.exr
- Notice that
exrcheckcrashes with an ASAN stack-trace.
Impact
An attacker might exploit this vulnerability by feeding a maliciously crafted file to a program that uses the OpenEXR libraries, thus gaining the capability to write an arbitrary amount of bytes in the heap. This could potentially result in code execution in the process.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | openexr | ≥ 3.3.0&&< 3.3.3 | 3.3.3pip install --upgrade 'openexr==3.3.3' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for openexr, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update openexr to 3.3.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-48071 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-48071 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2025-48071. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-48071 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2025-48071 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.