NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2024-56374 — django

MEDIUMFix: django/django@4806731

CVE-2024-56374 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.8) CWE-770 vulnerability in django. A fix is available for django — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Django has a potential denial-of-service vulnerability in IPv6 validation

Also known asBIT-django-2024-56374GHSA-qcgg-j2x8-h9g8PYSEC-2025-1
Published
Updated
Affected
6 pkgs
Patched
6 / 6
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 7, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2024-56374.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs70th percentile — riskier than 70% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.82%1.65%2.47%0.1%1.3%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

6 pkgs affected
🐍django🐍django🐍django🐍django🐍django🐍django

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.5, 5.0 before 5.0.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.18. Lack of upper-bound limit enforcement in strings passed when performing IPv6 validation could lead to a potential denial-of-service attack. The undocumented and private functions clean_ipv6_address and is_valid_ipv6_address are vulnerable, as is the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field. (The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field is not affected.)

Affected Packages

6 total 6 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIdjango≥ 5.1&&< 5.1.55.1.5pip install --upgrade 'django==5.1.5'
🐍PyPIdjango≥ 5.0&&< 5.0.115.0.11pip install --upgrade 'django==5.0.11'
🐍PyPIdjango≥ 4.2&&< 4.2.184.2.18pip install --upgrade 'django==4.2.18'
🐍PyPIdjango≥ 5.1&&< 5.1.55.1.5pip install --upgrade 'django==5.1.5'
🐍PyPIdjango≥ 5.0&&< 5.0.115.0.11pip install --upgrade 'django==5.0.11'
🐍PyPIdjango≥ 4.2&&< 4.2.184.2.18pip install --upgrade 'django==4.2.18'

Affected Products

2 products · 4 configurations
OS
debian linuxdebian
1 version
11.0
Application
djangodjangoproject
≥ 5.1 && < 5.1.5
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for django, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update django to 5.1.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2024-56374 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Discovery 1 for RHEL 9discovery/discovery-server-rhel9:1.12.0-1RHSA-2025:1249
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.4 for RHEL 8ansible-automation-platform-24/lightspeed-rhel8-operator:2.4-33RHSA-2025:0722
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8automation-controller-0:4.6.7-1.el8apRHSA-2025:0777
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8ansible-automation-platform-25/lightspeed-rhel8:2.5.250121-2RHSA-2025:0782
Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8python-django-0:4.2.19-1.el8pcRHSA-2025:2399
Red Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9python-django-0:4.2.19-1.el9pcRHSA-2025:4576

Frequently Asked Questions

An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.5, 5.0 before 5.0.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.18. Lack of upper-bound limit enforcement in strings passed when performing IPv6 validation could lead to a potential denial-of-service attack. The undocumented and private functions clean_ipv6_address and is_valid_ipv6_address are vulnerable, as is the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field. (The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field is not affected.)
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2024-56374 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2024-56374: django — Fixed in 5.1.5