CVE-2024-40647 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) Information Exposure vulnerability in sentry-sdk. A fix is available for sentry-sdk — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Unintentional exposure of environment variables to subprocesses in sentry-sdk
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2024-40647.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
sentry-sdk🐍sentry-sdkReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
The bug in Sentry's Python SDK <2.8.0 results in the unintentional exposure of environment variables to subprocesses despite the env={} setting.
Details
In Python's subprocess calls, all environment variables are passed to subprocesses by default. However, if you specifically do not want them to be passed to subprocesses, you may use env argument in subprocess calls, like in this example:
>>> subprocess.check_output(["env"], env={"TEST":"1"})
b'TEST=1\n'
If you'd want to not pass any variables, you can set an empty dict:
>>> subprocess.check_output(["env"], env={})
b''
However, the bug in Sentry SDK <2.8.0 causes all environment variables to be passed to the subprocesses when env={} is set, unless the Sentry SDK's Stdlib integration is disabled. The Stdlib integration is enabled by default.
Patches
The issue has been patched in https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-python/pull/3251 and the fix released in sentry-sdk==2.8.0. The fix was also backported to sentry-sdk==1.45.1.
Workarounds
We strongly recommend upgrading to the latest SDK version. However, if it's not possible, and if passing environment variables to child processes poses a security risk for you, there are two options:
- In your application, replace
env={}with the minimal dictenv={"EMPTY_ENV":"1"}or similar.
OR
- Disable Stdlib integration:
import sentry_sdk
# Should go before sentry_sdk.init
sentry_sdk.integrations._DEFAULT_INTEGRATIONS.remove("sentry_sdk.integrations.stdlib.StdlibIntegration")
sentry_sdk.init(...)
References
- Sentry docs: Default integrations
- Python docs: subprocess module
- Patch https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-python/pull/3251
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | sentry-sdk | ≥ 2.0.0a1&&< 2.8.0 | 2.8.0pip install --upgrade 'sentry-sdk==2.8.0' |
| 🐍PyPI | sentry-sdk | all versions | 1.45.1pip install --upgrade 'sentry-sdk==1.45.1' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for sentry-sdk, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update sentry-sdk to 2.8.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2024-40647 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Assume what was exposed is already known: rotate any credential, token or key that the affected component could return, restrict the endpoint to callers that genuinely need it, and strip sensitive fields from responses and error output at the boundary rather than relying on the client not to read them.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2024-40647 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.