NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2024-3651 — idna

MEDIUMFix: kjd/idna@1d365e1

CVE-2024-3651 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.2) CWE-1333 vulnerability in idna. 1 public exploit or proof-of-concept reference is indexed, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for idna — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Denial of Service via Quadratic Complexity in kjd/idna

Also known asGHSA-jjg7-2v4v-x38hPYSEC-2024-60
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Nov 8, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2024-3651.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs72th percentile — riskier than 72% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.19%0.75%1.32%1.89%0.7%1.4%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍idna

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

A specially crafted argument to the idna.encode() function could consume significant resources. This may lead to a denial-of-service.

Patches

The function has been refined to reject such strings without the associated resource consumption in version 3.7.

Workarounds

Domain names cannot exceed 253 characters in length, if this length limit is enforced prior to passing the domain to the idna.encode() function it should no longer consume significant resources. This is triggered by arbitrarily large inputs that would not occur in normal usage, but may be passed to the library assuming there is no preliminary input validation by the higher-level application.

References

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIidnaall versions3.7pip install --upgrade 'idna==3.7'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
internationalized domain names in applicationskjd
≥ 0.2 && < 3.7
range
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for idna, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update idna to 3.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2024-3651 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate

The vulnerability in the idna.encode() function, allowing for resource consumption via specially crafted arguments, is categorized as a moderate severity issue due to its potential impact on system availability rather than data integrity or confidentiality. While the vulnerability can lead to a denial-of-service…

Workaround published by Red Hat
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options don't meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2024-3651 (CC BY 4.0)
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.4 for RHEL 8python3x-idna-0:3.7-1.el8apRHSA-2024:3781
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Supportpython-idna-0:2.4-2.el7_9RHSA-2024:8365
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8python39:3.9-8100020240516111311.d47b87a4RHSA-2024:3466
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8python-idna-0:2.5-7.el8_10RHSA-2024:4260
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Supportpython-idna-0:2.5-5.el8_6.1RHSA-2024:3552
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Supportpython-idna-0:2.5-5.el8_8.1RHSA-2024:3543
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9python-idna-0:2.10-7.el9_4.1RHSA-2024:3846

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact A specially crafted argument to the `idna.encode()` function could consume significant resources. This may lead to a denial-of-service. ### Patches The function has been refined to reject such strings without the associated resource consumption in version 3.7. ### Workarounds Domain names cannot exceed 253 characters in length, if this length limit is enforced prior to passing the domain to the `idna.encode()` function it should no longer consume significant resources. This is triggered by arbitrarily large inputs that would not occur in normal usage, but may be passed to the libr
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2024-3651 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2024-3651: idna — Fixed in 3.7