NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
💎
💎 RubyGems
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2024-26141 — rack

MEDIUMFix: rack/rack@4849132

CVE-2024-26141 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.8) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in rack. A fix is available for rack — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Possible DoS Vulnerability with Range Header in Rack

Also known asGHSA-xj5v-6v4g-jfw6
Published
Updated
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 8, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2024-26141.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs76th percentile — riskier than 76% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.70%1.41%2.11%0.4%1.6%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
💎rack💎rack

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects RubyGems packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Possible DoS Vulnerability with Range Header in Rack

There is a possible DoS vulnerability relating to the Range request header in Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-26141.

Versions Affected: >= 1.3.0. Not affected: < 1.3.0 Fixed Versions: 3.0.9.1, 2.2.8.1

Impact

Carefully crafted Range headers can cause a server to respond with an unexpectedly large response. Responding with such large responses could lead to a denial of service issue.

Vulnerable applications will use the Rack::File middleware or the Rack::Utils.byte_ranges methods (this includes Rails applications).

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.

Patches

To aid users who aren't able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.

  • 3-0-range.patch - Patch for 3.0 series
  • 2-2-range.patch - Patch for 2.2 series

Credits

Thank you ooooooo_q for the report and patch

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
💎RubyGemsrack≥ 3.0.0&&< 3.0.9.13.0.9.1bundle update rack --conservative
💎RubyGemsrack≥ 1.3.0&&< 2.2.8.12.2.8.1bundle update rack --conservative

Affected Products

2 products · 3 configurations
OS
debian linuxdebian
1 version
10.0
Application
rackrack
≥ 3.0.0 && < 3.0.9.1
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for rack, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update rack to 3.0.9.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2024-26141 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate

Red Hat rates this vulnerability as a Moderate impact as this requires a specifically crafted response.

Workaround published by Red Hat
No mitigation is currently available for this vulnerability. The recommendation is to perform updates as soon as they are available.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2024-26141 (CC BY 4.0)
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8pcs-0:0.10.18-2.el8_10RHSA-2024:2953
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Telecommunications Update Servicepcs-0:0.10.4-6.el8_2.5RHSA-2024:2007
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Supportpcs-0:0.10.8-1.el8_4.5RHSA-2024:2584
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Supportpcs-0:0.10.12-6.el8_6.5RHSA-2024:3431
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Supportpcs-0:0.10.15-4.el8_8.2RHSA-2024:2581
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9pcs-0:0.11.7-2.el9_4RHSA-2024:2113
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Extended Update Supportpcs-0:0.11.1-10.el9_0.5RHSA-2024:1841
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Supportpcs-0:0.11.4-7.el9_2.1RHSA-2024:1846

Frequently Asked Questions

# Possible DoS Vulnerability with Range Header in Rack There is a possible DoS vulnerability relating to the Range request header in Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-26141. Versions Affected: >= 1.3.0. Not affected: < 1.3.0 Fixed Versions: 3.0.9.1, 2.2.8.1 Impact ------ Carefully crafted Range headers can cause a server to respond with an unexpectedly large response. Responding with such large responses could lead to a denial of service issue. Vulnerable applications will use the `Rack::File` middleware or the `Rack::Utils.byte_ranges` meth
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2024-26141 in your dependencies?

Find it across RubyGems, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2024-26141: rack DoS — Fixed in 3.0.9.1