CVE-2023-48238 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability in json-web-token. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for json-web-token — see the affected versions and patch details below.
JWT Algorithm Confusion in json-web-token library
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2023-48238.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2023-48238 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,567 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
json-web-tokennpmDescription
Summary
The json-web-token library is vulnerable to a JWT algorithm confusion attack.
Details
On line 86 of the 'index.js' file, the algorithm to use for verifying the signature of the JWT token is taken from the JWT token, which at that point is still unverified and thus shouldn't be trusted. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker needs to craft a malicious JWT token containing the HS256 algorithm, signed with the public RSA key of the victim application. This attack will only work against this library is the RS256 algorithm is in use, however it is a best practice to use that algorithm.
PoC
Take a server running the following code:
const express = require('express');
const jwt = require('json-web-token');
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const app = express();
const port = 3000;
// Load the keys from the file
const publicKeyPath = path.join(__dirname, 'public-key.pem');
const publicKey = fs.readFileSync(publicKeyPath, 'utf8');
const privateKeyPath = path.join(__dirname, 'private-key.pem');
const privateKey = fs.readFileSync(privateKeyPath, 'utf8');
app.use(express.json());
// Endpoint to generate a JWT token with admin: False
app.get('/generateToken', async (req, res) => {
const payload = { admin: false, name: req.query.name };
const token = await jwt.encode(privateKey, payload, 'RS256', function (err, token) {
res.json({ token });
});
});
// Middleware to verify the JWT token
function verifyToken(req, res, next) {
const token = req.query.token;
jwt.decode(publicKey, token, (err, decoded) => {
if (err) {
console.log(err)
return res.status(401).json({ message: 'Token authentication failed' });
}
req.decoded = decoded;
next();
});
}
// Endpoint to check if you are the admin or not
app.get('/checkAdmin', verifyToken, (req, res) => {
res.json(req.decoded);
});
app.listen(port, () => {
console.log(`Server is running on port ${port}`);
});
Public key recovery
First, an attacker needs to recover the public key from the server in any way possible. It is possible to extract this from just two JWT tokens as shown below.
Grab two different JWT tokens and utilize the following tool: https://github.com/silentsignal/rsa_sign2n/blob/release/standalone/jwt_forgery.py
python3 jwt_forgery.py token1 token2
The tool will generate 4 different public keys, all in different formats. Try the following for all 4 formats.
Algorithm confusion
Change the JWT to the HS256 algorithm and modify any of the contents to your liking at https://jwt.io/.
Copy the resulting JWT token and use with the following tool: https://github.com/ticarpi/jwt_tool.
python /opt/jwt_tool/jwt_tool.py --exploit k -pk public_key token
You will now get a resulting JWT token that is validly signed.
Impact
Applications using the RS256 algorithm, are vulnerable to this algorithm confusion attack which allows attackers to sign arbitrary payloads that the verifier will accept.
Solution
Either one of the following solutions will work.
- Change the signature of the
decodefunction to ensure that the algorithm is set in that call - Check whether or not the secret could be a public key in the decode function and in that case, set the key to be a public key.
Fixed in 4.0.0. Both encode and decode now reject combinations where the key type (PEM vs plain secret) doesn't match the algorithm family. Upgrade with npm install json-web-token@^4.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | json-web-token | all versions | 4.0.0npm install json-web-token@4.0.0 |
Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for json-web-token, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update json-web-token to 4.0.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2023-48238 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2023-48238 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2023-48238. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2023-48238 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2023-48238 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.