NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2023-36811 — borgbackup

MEDIUMFix: borgbackup/borg@3eb0701

CVE-2023-36811 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.7) CWE-347 vulnerability in borgbackup. A fix is available for borgbackup — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Archive spoofing vulnerability in borgbackup

Also known asGHSA-8fjr-hghr-4m99PYSEC-2023-164
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 6, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2023-36811.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.1%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs1th percentile — riskier than 1% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.20%0.41%0.61%0.1%0.1%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍borgbackup

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

A flaw in the cryptographic authentication scheme in borgbackup allowed an attacker to fake archives and potentially indirectly cause backup data loss in the repository.

The attack requires an attacker to be able to

  1. insert files (with no additional headers) into backups
  2. gain write access to the repository

This vulnerability does not disclose plaintext to the attacker, nor does it affect the authenticity of existing archives.

Creating plausible fake archives may be feasible for empty or small archives, but is unlikely for large archives.

Affected are all borgbackup releases prior to 1.2.5.

Note: CVSS scoring model seemed to badly fit for this case, thus I manually set score to "moderate".

Patches

The issue has been fixed in borgbackup 1.2.5. But there was a bug in 1.2.5 upgrade instructions, thus 1.2.6 with an important fix in docs and code was released a day afterwards.

Additionally to installing the fixed code, users must follow the upgrade procedure as documented in the latest version of the change log.

Workarounds

Data loss after being attacked can be avoided by reviewing the archives (timestamp and contents valid and as expected) after any "borg check --repair" and before "borg prune".

References

https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/blob/1.2.6/docs/changes.rst#pre-125-archives-spoofing-vulnerability-cve-2023-36811

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIborgbackupall versions1.2.5pip install --upgrade 'borgbackup==1.2.5'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
borgborgbackup
< 1.2.5
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for borgbackup, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update borgbackup to 1.2.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2023-36811 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact A flaw in the cryptographic authentication scheme in borgbackup allowed an attacker to fake archives and potentially indirectly cause backup data loss in the repository. The attack requires an attacker to be able to 1. insert files (with no additional headers) into backups 2. gain write access to the repository This vulnerability does not disclose plaintext to the attacker, nor does it affect the authenticity of existing archives. Creating plausible fake archives may be feasible for empty or small archives, but is unlikely for large archives. Affected are all borgbackup release
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2023-36811 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2023-36811: borgbackup — Fixed in 1.2.5