CVE-2023-26492 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in directus. 1 public exploit or proof-of-concept reference is indexed, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for directus — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Directus vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery On File Import
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2023-26492.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
directusnpmDescription
Summary
Directus versions <=9.22.4 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) when importing a file from a remote web server (POST to /files/import). An attacker can bypass the security controls that were implemented to patch vulnerability CVE-2022-23080 by performing a DNS rebinding attack and view sensitive data from internal servers or perform a local port scan (eg. can access internal metadata API for AWS at http://169.254.169.254 event if 169.254.169.254 is in the deny IP list).
Details
DNS rebinding attacks work by running a DNS name server that resolves two different IP addresses when a domain is resolved simultaneously. This type of attack can be exploited to bypass the IP address deny list validation that was added to /api/src/services/file.ts for the function importOne to mitigate the previous SSRF vulnerability CVE-2022-23080. The validation in /api/src/services/file.ts first checks if the resolved IP address for a domain name does not a resolve to an IP address in the deny list:
let ip = resolvedUrl.hostname;
if (net.isIP(ip) === 0) {
try {
ip = (await lookupDNS(ip)).address;
} catch (err: any) {
logger.warn(err, `Couldn't lookup the DNS for url ${importURL}`);
throw new ServiceUnavailableException(`Couldn't fetch file from url "${importURL}"`, {
service: 'external-file',
});
}
}
if (env.IMPORT_IP_DENY_LIST.includes('0.0.0.0')) {
const networkInterfaces = os.networkInterfaces();
for (const networkInfo of Object.values(networkInterfaces)) {
if (!networkInfo) continue;
for (const info of networkInfo) {
if (info.address === ip) {
logger.warn(`Requested URL ${importURL} resolves to localhost.`);
throw new ServiceUnavailableException(`Couldn't fetch file from url "${importURL}"`, {
service: 'external-file',
});
}
}
}
}
if (env.IMPORT_IP_DENY_LIST.includes(ip)) {
logger.warn(`Requested URL ${importURL} resolves to a denied IP address.`);
throw new ServiceUnavailableException(`Couldn't fetch file from url "${importURL}"`, {
service: 'external-file',
});
}
Once it validates that the resolved IP address is not in the deny list, then it uses axios to GET the url and saves the response content.
try {
fileResponse = await axios.get<Readable>(encodeURL(importURL), {
responseType: 'stream',
});
} catch (err: any) {
logger.warn(err, `Couldn't fetch file from url "${importURL}"`);
throw new ServiceUnavailableException(`Couldn't fetch file from url "${importURL}"`, {
service: 'external-file',
});
}
However, this validation check and fetching the web resource causes to DNS queries that enable a DNS rebinding attack. On the first DNS query, an attacker controlled name server can be configured to resolve to an external IP address that is not in the deny list to bypass the validation. Then when axios is called, the name server resolves the domain name to a local IP address.
PoC
To demonstrate we will be using an online tool named rebinder. Rebinder randomly changes the IP address it resolves to depending on the subdomain. For an example, 7f000001.8efa468e.rbndr.us can resolve to either 142.250.70.142 (google.com) or 127.0.0.1. Sending multiple POST requests to /files/import using this domain will eventually cause a resolution to 142.250.70.142 first to bypass the validation then fetch the sensitive from an internal server when axios is called.
The following screenshots show what it looks like when a successful attack occurs.
Downloading a file named secret.txt from a webserver running from http://127.0.0.1/secret.txt

Receiving the request from the internal server. Note that the incoming connection is from 127.0.0.1.

After downloading the file it leaks the content of the secret file.

Impact
An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to access highly sensitive internal server and steal sensitive information. An example is on Cloud Environments that utilise internal APIs for managing machine and privileges. For an example, if directus is hosted on AWS EC2 instance and has an IAM role assigned to the EC2 instance then an attacker can exploit this vulnerability to steal the AWS access keys to impersonate the EC2 instance using the AWS API.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | directus | all versions | 9.23.0npm install directus@9.23.0 |
Affected Products
directusmonospaceResearch use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for directus, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update directus to 9.23.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2023-26492 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2023-26492 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.