CVE-2022-39314 — getkirby/cms
MEDIUMCVE-2022-39314 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.8) CWE-307 vulnerability in getkirby/cms. A fix is available for getkirby/cms — see the affected versions and patch details below.
User enumeration in the code-based login and password reset forms
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2022-39314.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2022-39314 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
getkirby/cms🐘getkirby/cms🐘getkirby/cms🐘getkirby/cmsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
TL;DR
This vulnerability only affects you if you are using the code or password-reset auth method with the auth.methods option. It can only be successfully exploited under server configuration conditions outside of the attacker's control.
Introduction
User enumeration is a type of vulnerability that allows attackers to confirm which users are registered in a Kirby installation. This information can be abused for social engineering attacks against users of the site or to find out the organizational structure of the company.
User enumeration attacks are performed by entering an existing and a non-existing user into the email address field of the login form. If the system returns a different response or behaves differently depending on whether the user exists, the attacker can enter unknown email addresses and use the different behavior as a clue for the (non-)existing user.
Impact
Under normal circumstances, entering an invalid email address results in a "fake" login code form that looks exactly like the one of an existing user (unless debugging is enabled). However, the code that handles the creation of a code challenge (for code-based login or password reset) didn't catch errors that occurred while the challenge request was processed:
- If the challenge itself runs into an error (e.g. if the email could not be sent), attackers could tell existing users (where the challenge code is called) from non-existing users (where the challenge code is not called and therefore does not output an error).
- If you are using the
user.login:failedhook and any exception is thrown within the hook, attackers could see that the user does not exist.
As long as no error occurs during challenge creation and during the processing of the user.login:failed hook, your Kirby sites are not affected by this vulnerability.
Patches
The problems have been patched in Kirby 3.5.8.2, Kirby 3.6.6.2, Kirby 3.7.5.1 and Kirby 3.8.1. Please update to one of these or a later version to fix the vulnerability.
All of the mentioned releases contain two patches for this vulnerability:
- All errors that occur during the creation of an auth challenge (code-based login or password reset) are swallowed by the backend and only displayed to the user if debugging is enabled.
- We added a new
auth.debugoption that can be enabled separately from thedebugoption. If disabled, auth errors are only printed to the PHP error log. This ensures that security-critical errors are only displayed if they are really necessary for debugging.
Workarounds
We recommend to update to one of the patch releases. If you cannot update immediately, you can work around the issue by setting the auth.methods option to password, which disables the code-based login and password reset forms.
However please note that your site will still be vulnerable against another user enumeration issue that was also fixed in the same patch releases.
Credits
Thanks to Florian Merz (@florianmrz) of hatchery.io for responsibly reporting the identified issue.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | getkirby/cms | ≥ 3.5.0&&< 3.5.8.2 | 3.5.8.2composer require getkirby/cms:^3.5.8.2 |
| 🐘Packagist | getkirby/cms | ≥ 3.6.0&&< 3.6.6.2 | 3.6.6.2composer require getkirby/cms:^3.6.6.2 |
| 🐘Packagist | getkirby/cms | ≥ 3.7.0&&< 3.7.5.1 | 3.7.5.1composer require getkirby/cms:^3.7.5.1 |
| 🐘Packagist | getkirby/cms | ≥ 3.8.0&&< 3.8.1 | 3.8.1composer require getkirby/cms:^3.8.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for getkirby/cms, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update getkirby/cms to 3.5.8.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2022-39314 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2022-39314 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2022-39314. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2022-39314 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2022-39314 across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.