NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2022-36087 — oauthlib

MEDIUMFix: oauthlib/oauthlib@2e40b41

CVE-2022-36087 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.7) Improper Input Validation vulnerability in oauthlib. 3 public exploit or proof-of-concept references are indexed, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for oauthlib — see the affected versions and patch details below.

OAuthLib vulnerable DoS when attacker provides malicious IPV6 URI

Also known asGHSA-3pgj-pg6c-r5p7PYSEC-2022-269
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
3 known
Exploitation data as of Nov 5, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2022-36087.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.8%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk+0.11%
Lower risk than most CVEs78th percentile — riskier than 78% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.76%1.52%2.28%0.4%1.8%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍oauthlib

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

  • Attacker providing malicious redirect uri can cause DoS to oauthlib's web application.
  • Attacker can also leverage usage of uri_validate functions depending where it is used.

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?

Oauthlib applications using OAuth2.0 provider support or use directly uri_validate function.

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

Issue fixed in 3.2.2 release.

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

The redirect_uri can be verified in web toolkit (i.e bottle-oauthlib, django-oauth-toolkit, ...) before oauthlib is called. A sample check if : is present to reject the request can prevent the DoS, assuming no port or IPv6 is fundamentally required.

References

Attack Vector:

PoC

is_absolute_uri("http://[:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::]/path")

Acknowledgement

Special thanks to Sebastian Chnelik - PyUp.io

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIoauthlib≥ 3.1.1&&< 3.2.23.2.2pip install --upgrade 'oauthlib==3.2.2'

Affected Products

2 products · 2 configurations
OS
fedorafedoraproject
1 version
37
Application
oauthliboauthlib_project
≥ 3.1.1 && < 3.2.1
range
Exploits & PoCs
3

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for oauthlib, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update oauthlib to 3.2.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2022-36087 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Stop reflecting attacker-controlled destinations: resolve every redirect target against an allowlist of paths or hosts you own, prefer a server-side key over a full URL in the request, and reject absolute URLs entirely where the flow only ever needs a relative one.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate
Workaround published by Red Hat
The redirect_uri can be verified in the web toolkit before OAuthLib is called. Check to see if `:` is present to reject the request can prevent the denial of service, assuming no port or IPv6 is fundamentally required.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2022-36087 (CC BY 4.0)
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9fence-agents-0:4.10.0-43.el9RHSA-2023:2161

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact - Attacker providing malicious redirect uri can cause DoS to oauthlib's web application. - Attacker can also leverage usage of `uri_validate` functions depending where it is used. _What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_ Oauthlib applications using OAuth2.0 provider support or use directly `uri_validate` function. ### Patches _Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_ Issue fixed in 3.2.2 release. ### Workarounds _Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_ The `redirect_uri` can be verified in web
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2022-36087 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2022-36087: oauthlib DoS — Fixed in 3.2.2