NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2022-35961 — @openzeppelin/contracts

HIGHFix: OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts#3610

CVE-2022-35961 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.9) CWE-354 vulnerability in @openzeppelin/contracts. A fix is available for @openzeppelin/contracts — see the affected versions and patch details below.

ECDSA signature malleability in OpenZeppelin Contracts

Also known asGHSA-4h98-2769-gh6h
Published
Updated
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2022-35961.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs40th percentile — riskier than 40% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.32%0.64%0.95%0.2%0.5%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

4Kother npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
@openzeppelin/contractsnpm
1.4Mdownloads / week
@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeablenpm
438Kdownloads / week

Description

Impact

The functions ECDSA.recover and ECDSA.tryRecover are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issue for the functions that take a single bytes argument, and not the functions that take r, v, s or r, vs as separate arguments.

The potentially affected contracts are those that implement signature reuse or replay protection by marking the signature itself as used rather than the signed message or a nonce included in it. A user may take a signature that has already been submitted, submit it again in a different form, and bypass this protection.

Patches

The issue has been patched in 4.7.3.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, or need assistance deploying a fix, email us at [email protected].

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@openzeppelin/contracts≥ 4.1.0&&< 4.7.34.7.3npm install @openzeppelin/contracts@4.7.3
📦npm@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable≥ 4.1.0&&< 4.7.34.7.3npm install @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable@4.7.3

Affected Products

2 products · 2 configurations
Application
contractsopenzeppelin
≥ 4.1.0 && < 4.7.3
range
Application
contracts upgradeableopenzeppelin
≥ 4.1.0 && < 4.7.3
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @openzeppelin/contracts, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update @openzeppelin/contracts to 4.7.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2022-35961 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact The functions `ECDSA.recover` and `ECDSA.tryRecover` are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issue for the functions that take a single `bytes` argument, and not the functions that take `r, v, s` or `r, vs` as separate arguments. The potentially affected contracts are those that implement signature reuse or replay protection by marking the signature itself as used rather than the signed message or a nonce included in it. A user may take a signature that
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2022-35961 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2022-35961: @openzeppelin/contracts — Fixed in 4.7.3