NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2022-35916 — @openzeppelin/contracts

MEDIUMFix: OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts#3578

CVE-2022-35916 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-669 vulnerability in @openzeppelin/contracts. A fix is available for @openzeppelin/contracts — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Cross chain utilities for Arbitrum L2 see EOA calls as cross chain calls

Also known asGHSA-9j3m-g383-29qr
Published
Updated
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 9, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2022-35916.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs49th percentile — riskier than 49% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.37%0.73%1.10%0.2%0.6%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

4Kother npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
@openzeppelin/contractsnpm
1.4Mdownloads / week
@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeablenpm
440Kdownloads / week

Description

Impact

Contracts using the cross chain utilies for Arbitrum L2, CrossChainEnabledArbitrumL2 or LibArbitrumL2, will classify direct interactions of externally owned accounts (EOAs) as cross chain calls, even though they are not started on L1. This is assessed as low severity because any action taken by an EOA on the contract could also be taken by the EOA through the bridge if the issue was not present.

Patches

This issue has been patched in v4.7.2.

References

https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3578

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, or need assistance deploying a fix, email us at [email protected].

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@openzeppelin/contracts≥ 4.6.0&&< 4.7.24.7.2npm install @openzeppelin/contracts@4.7.2
📦npm@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable≥ 4.6.0&&< 4.7.24.7.2npm install @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable@4.7.2

Affected Products

2 products · 2 configurations
Application
contractsopenzeppelin
≥ 4.6.0 && < 4.7.2
range
Application
contracts upgradeableopenzeppelin
≥ 4.6.0 && < 4.7.2
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @openzeppelin/contracts, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update @openzeppelin/contracts to 4.7.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2022-35916 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Contracts using the cross chain utilies for Arbitrum L2, `CrossChainEnabledArbitrumL2` or `LibArbitrumL2`, will classify direct interactions of externally owned accounts (EOAs) as cross chain calls, even though they are not started on L1. This is assessed as low severity because any action taken by an EOA on the contract could also be taken by the EOA through the bridge if the issue was not present. ### Patches This issue has been patched in v4.7.2. ### References https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3578 ### For more information If you have any questio
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2022-35916 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2022-35916: @openzeppelin/contracts — Fixed in 4.7.2