How severe is CVE-2009-5012?

No CVSS score has been assigned to CVE-2009-5012 yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by CVE-2009-5012?

CVE-2009-5012 affects the following packages: pyftpdlib (PyPI). Ecosystems affected: PyPI.

How do I fix CVE-2009-5012?

Update pyftpdlib to 0.5.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2009-5012 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect CVE-2009-5012 in my PyPI dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pyftpdlib, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate CVE-2009-5012 if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

How does O3 Security protect against CVE-2009-5012?

O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2009-5012 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Is CVE-2009-5012 actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for CVE-2009-5012 yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for CVE-2009-5012?

CVE-2009-5012 has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 1.0%, placing it in the 61th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is CVE-2009-5012?

CVE-2009-5012 is classified as CWE-264 (CWE-264). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation.

When was CVE-2009-5012 published, and has it been updated?

CVE-2009-5012 was published on October 19, 2010 and was last updated on April 10, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

🐍 PyPI

Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2009-5012 — pyftpdlib

CVE-2009-5012 is a CWE-264 vulnerability in pyftpdlib. A fix is available for pyftpdlib — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Improper Access Control in pyftpdlib

Also known asGHSA-h4g7-8m7r-87r9PYSEC-2010-9

Published

Oct 19, 2010

Updated

Apr 10, 2026

Affected

1 pkg

Patched

1 / 1

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

1.0%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk0.00%

Lower risk than most CVEs61th percentile — riskier than 61% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

🐍pyftpdlib

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

ftpserver.py in pyftpdlib before 0.5.2 does not require the l permission for the MLST command, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions and list the root directory via an FTP session.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
🐍PyPI	`pyftpdlib`	all versions	0.5.2`pip install --upgrade 'pyftpdlib==0.5.2'`

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pyftpdlib, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update pyftpdlib to 0.5.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2009-5012 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2009-5012 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2009-5012. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2009-5012 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2009-5012 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works