NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2009-2940 — pygresql

Fix: PyGreSQL/PyGreSQL@8e19320

CVE-2009-2940 is a security vulnerability in pygresql. A fix is available for pygresql — see the affected versions and patch details below.

PyGreSQL Might Be Vulnerable to Encoding-Based SQL Injection

Also known asGHSA-xv6x-43gq-4hfjPYSEC-2009-18
Published
Updated
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
1 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 30, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
2.7%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs86th percentile — riskier than 86% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%1.11%2.23%3.34%0.6%2.7%May 26Aug 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐍pygresql🐍pygresql

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

PyGreSQL 3.8 did not use PostgreSQL’s safe string and bytea functions in its own escaping functions. As a result, applications written to use PyGreSQL’s escaping functions are vulnerable to SQL injections when processing certain multi-byte character sequences. Because the safe functions require a database connection, to maintain backwards compatibility, pg.escape_string() and pg.escape_bytea() are still available, but applications will have to be adjusted to use the new pyobj.escape_string() and pyobj.escape_bytea() functions. For example, code containing:

import pg
connection = pg.connect(...)
escaped = pg.escape_string(untrusted_input)

should be adjusted to use:

import pg
connection = pg.connect(...)
escaped = connection.escape_string(untrusted_input)

Affected Packages

2 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIpygresqlall versionsNo fix
🐍PyPIpygresql≥ 4.0&&< 4.14.1pip install --upgrade 'pygresql==4.1'

Affected Products

1 product · 2 configurations
Application
pygresqlpygresql
2 versions
3.8.14.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pygresql, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    A fix is available for CVE-2009-2940; check the affected-versions list above or the advisory for the patched release of pygresql, then make sure no transitive dependency still pins the vulnerable range.

  3. Workarounds

    Until you can upgrade, make sure every query built from user input uses parameterised statements or a prepared-statement API rather than string concatenation, and reduce the database account's privileges so an injected query cannot read or alter data beyond what the feature needs.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Frequently Asked Questions

PyGreSQL 3.8 did not use PostgreSQL’s safe `string` and `bytea` functions in its own escaping functions. As a result, applications written to use PyGreSQL’s escaping functions are vulnerable to SQL injections when processing certain multi-byte character sequences. Because the safe functions require a database connection, to maintain backwards compatibility, `pg.escape_string()` and `pg.escape_bytea()` are still available, but applications will have to be adjusted to use the new `pyobj.escape_string()` and `pyobj.escape_bytea()` functions. For example, code containing: ```python import pg conn
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2009-2940 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2009-2940: pygresql SQL Injection — Fixed in 4.1