CVE-2026-32771 — monitoring
Fix: ctfer-io/monitoring@269dba1CVE-2026-32771 is a Path Traversal vulnerability in github.com/ctfer-io/monitoring. A fix is available for github.com/ctfer-io/monitoring — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Monitoring is vulnerable to Archive Slip due to missing checks in sanitization
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-32771.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/ctfer-io/monitoringReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
The sanitizeArchivePath function in pkg/extract/extract.go (lines 248–254) is vulnerable to a path traversal bypass due to a missing trailing path separator in the strings.HasPrefix check. A crafted tar archive can write files outside the intended destination directory when using the extractor CLI tool or the extract.DumpOTelCollector library function.
Vulnerable Code
File: pkg/extract/extract.go, lines 248–254
func sanitizeArchivePath(d, t string) (v string, err error) {
v = filepath.Join(d, t)
if strings.HasPrefix(v, filepath.Clean(d)) { // ← missing trailing separator
return v, nil
}
return "", fmt.Errorf("filepath is tainted: %s", t)
}
The function is called at line 219 inside untar, which is invoked by copyFromPod (line 205) during the Cold Extract data dump workflow.
Root Cause
strings.HasPrefix(v, filepath.Clean(d)) does not append a trailing / to the directory prefix, causing a directory name prefix collision. If the destination is /home/user/extract-output and a tar entry is named ../extract-outputevil/pwned, the joined path /home/user/extract-outputevil/pwned passes the prefix check — it starts with /home/user/extract-output — even though it is entirely outside the intended directory.
Steps to Reproduce
-
Deploy the monitoring stack with
ColdExtract: true. The OTEL Collector begins writing signal data (otel_traces,otel_metrics,otel_logs) to the shared PVC. -
Place the PoC tar on the PVC. Any pod with write access to the
ReadWriteManyPVC (or the compromised OTEL Collector itself) copies apoc-path-traversal.tarinto the/data/collectormount path. The archive contains three real-looking OTLP telemetry files alongside two crafted entries with path-traversal names. -
Run the extractor against the namespace:
extractor \ --namespace monitoring \ --pvc-name <signals-pvc-name> \ --directory /home/user/extract-output -
Observe the bypass.
untarprocesses the tar stream. For the malicious entries:// entry name: ../extract-outputevil/poc-proof.txt filepath.Join("/home/user/extract-output", "../extract-outputevil/poc-proof.txt") => "/home/user/extract-outputevil/poc-proof.txt" strings.HasPrefix("/home/user/extract-outputevil/poc-proof.txt", "/home/user/extract-output") => true // BUG: prefix collision; file lands OUTSIDE target dirBoth malicious entries are written outside
/home/user/extract-output/. The three legitimate OTLP files land correctly inside it.
Impact
Successful exploitation gives an attacker arbitrary file write on the machine running the extractor. Real-world primitives include:
- Overwriting
~/.bashrc/~/.zshrc/~/.profilefor RCE on next shell login - Appending to
~/.ssh/authorized_keysfor persistent SSH backdoor - Dropping a malicious entry into
~/.kube/configto hijack cluster access - Writing crontab entries for persistent scheduled execution
The attack surface is widened by the default ReadWriteMany PVC access mode, which means any pod in the cluster with the PVC mounted can inject the payload — not just the OTEL Collector itself.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/ctfer-io/monitoring | all versions | 0.2.2go get github.com/ctfer-io/monitoring@v0.2.2 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/ctfer-io/monitoring, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/ctfer-io/monitoring to 0.2.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-32771 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-32771 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-32771. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-32771 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-32771 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.